Parallel cable current sharing calculator

Estimate Australian parallel cable current sharing from entered total current and run impedance records for project review.

  • Calculator
  • Cable sizing
  • Australia
Use the feeder, board, drawing or parallel-run reference.
A
Enter the total current being shared by the parallel runs.
mohm
Enter the run impedance in milliohm from the project source.
mohm
Enter the second run impedance on the same basis.
mohm
Enter the third run impedance if three runs are being compared.
%
Enter the project review target for current spread.
Ii = Itotal x (1 / Zi) / sum(1 / Z); Iavg = Itotal / n; spread = Imax - Imin; imbalance_% = spread / Iavg x 100
  • Run impedances are entered by the user.
  • The calculator uses inverse impedance sharing only.
  • The imbalance target is entered by the user.
  • The result does not select cables, protection or terminations.
Formula variables
VariableMeaningUnitUse
ItotalTotal currentAEntered current to be shared by the parallel cable runs.
ZiRun impedancemilliohmEntered impedance for each parallel run.
IiRun currentACalculated current carried by each run.
IavgAverage currentATotal current divided by populated run count.
spreadCurrent spreadAHighest run current minus lowest run current.
imbalance_%Current imbalance percent%Current spread divided by average current.
targetAllowed imbalance%User-entered project review threshold.
More

Parallel cable current sharing calculator technical guide

Estimate Australian parallel cable current sharing from entered total current and run impedance records for project review.

Use this calculator when parallel cable runs have separate impedance records and the reviewer needs to see whether current sharing is balanced enough to carry into cable, protection and installation review. It is a worksheet for entered source values, not a cable-selection tool.

Field use cases

Parallel cable sharing use cases
Work settingReal questionUseful action from this page
Parallel feeder recordHow much current does each entered run carry?Calculate run currents from inverse impedance sharing.
Unequal route lengthsDoes one run take materially more current?Compare current spread and imbalance percent.
Commissioning reviewDo measured or calculated impedances look balanced?Keep impedance source values beside the current split.
High-current planningDoes the split need engineering review before final records?Use high-current and imbalance flags as review prompts.
Downstream cable reviewWhich run needs attention first?Check the highest calculated run current first.

This page is most useful when the project already has a parallel-run record. It is not useful when the missing data is the cable size itself.

Data checklist

Parallel cable input sources
ValueWhere it normally comes fromStop if
Total currentLoad calculation, design record or measured load basisThe current basis differs from the downstream cable review.
Run impedanceMeasurement, engineering model, cable data plus route recordThe values are guessed or use different reference conditions.
Allowed imbalanceProject, engineering or review targetThe target is being treated as a standards rule without source.
Run countProject parallel cable arrangementRuns are not actually in parallel on the same basis.

If impedance data is uncertain, export the worksheet as a question record rather than a decision record.

Method comparison matrix

Current sharing method boundary
Method elementWhat this calculator doesWhat remains outside
Current splitWeights each run by inverse entered impedance.Detailed thermal or electromagnetic modelling.
Imbalance percentCompares current spread with average run current.Project acceptance criteria.
Target marginCompares imbalance with user-entered target.Final engineering or compliance decision.
High-current noteFlags large total current records.Protection, fault rating and switchboard review.

The method intentionally stays transparent. A useful result shows the inputs and the current split, then moves to a competent review.

Worked records

Parallel cable examples
SituationInputsResultRecord use
Three parallel runs300 A, 20/21/19 milliohm, 10% targetAbout 99.83 A, 95.08 A and 105.09 A; 10.01% imbalanceReview impedance source and terminations.
Matched runs240 A, closely matched impedances, 8% targetCurrent split remains close to the averageKeep source record with cable review.
High-current review520 A with different run impedancesHigh-current review note appliesCarry result into engineering review.

The examples show why small impedance differences can matter when total current is high.

Stop points

  • Run impedance values are not from the same source basis.
  • Total current belongs to a different load scenario.
  • The result is being used to choose cable size or protection settings by itself.
  • One run carries materially more current and no thermal review has been done.
  • The record has no source for the entered imbalance target.

The clean export record includes total current, run impedances, calculated run currents, imbalance percent, target margin and reviewer.

Three parallel feeder runs

A board feeder has three entered impedance records and the reviewer wants to see how the load splits.

Share reference
PARALLEL-RUN-1
Total current
300 A
Run impedances
20, 21, 19 milliohm
Allowed imbalance
10%
  1. Run currents99.83 A, 95.08 A, 105.09 A from inverse impedance sharing.
  2. Current spread10.01 A between highest and lowest run current.
  3. Imbalance10.01% against the entered target.
Current sharing10.01% imbalance

Target margin is -0.01%.

The entered impedances create a current spread just above the entered target, so cable lengths, terminations and source data need review.

  • Each impedance value is entered by the user from the project record.
  • Current sharing is estimated from inverse impedance only.
  • Protection, grouping, installation and thermal checks remain separate.

Matched parallel conductors

Three similar runs are checked as a record before the result is used in downstream capacity review.

Share reference
MATCHED-RUNS-1
Total current
240 A
Run impedances
18, 18.2, 18.1 milliohm
Allowed imbalance
8%
  1. Run currents80.44 A, 79.56 A, 80 A from inverse impedance sharing.
  2. Current spread0.88 A between highest and lowest run current.
  3. Imbalance1.1% against the entered target.
Current sharing1.1% imbalance

Target margin is 6.9%.

The current split is inside the entered imbalance target, while the source record should still be retained.

  • The runs are treated as parallel paths on the same phase basis.
  • Impedance values include the relevant route and termination basis entered by the reviewer.
  • No cable table or final selection is embedded.

High-current parallel review

A high-current run is checked before finalising route records and downstream conductor review.

Share reference
HIGH-CURRENT-PARALLEL
Total current
520 A
Run impedances
12, 13.5, 12.8 milliohm
Allowed imbalance
12%
  1. Run currents183.98 A, 163.54 A, 172.48 A from inverse impedance sharing.
  2. Current spread20.44 A between highest and lowest run current.
  3. Imbalance11.79% against the entered target.
Current sharing11.79% imbalance

Target margin is 0.21%.

The high-current flag keeps the result in review even when the arithmetic is transparent.

  • The entered total current is a project value.
  • Run impedance differences can come from length, conductor, temperature or termination assumptions.
  • Engineering review controls the final project decision.

Questions

Does this select parallel cable sizes?

No. It only estimates current split from entered impedance records. Cable sizing and current capacity remain separate reviews.

Where do impedance values come from?

They must be entered from a project, measurement, manufacturer, engineering or documented source record.

Can this be used for protection settings?

Only as a worksheet input. Protection coordination, fault rating and final settings need their own review.

Why use inverse impedance?

Lower impedance paths carry more current in this simplified sharing model, so each run is weighted by 1 divided by its entered impedance.

Does this prove the installation is acceptable?

No. Thermal effects, grouping, terminations, protection and competent review remain outside this page.