Circuit breaker and cable coordination context

A guide to keeping cable candidate, fault current and protective-device assumptions aligned before Australian protection review.

Coordination record purpose

Cable and protective-device decisions should not live in separate silos. Cable current-carrying capacity, voltage drop, fault current, clearing time, breaking capacity and I2t withstand can all affect the same project record.

This guide keeps the record aligned. It does not perform a manufacturer coordination study.

Workflow

  1. Record the cable candidate and current-carrying-capacity source.
  2. Record the protective-device type and data source.
  3. Prepare fault current from loop or source data.
  4. Review I2t withstand where fault duty and clearing time matter.
  5. Stop for manufacturer curves or engineering review when coordination is the actual question.

Coordination table

Cable and protection record alignment
AreaCalculator or sourceWhat must stay aligned
Cable candidateCable-size calculatorMetric label, material and source data
Voltage dropVoltage-drop calculatorRoute length and conductor data
Fault currentLoop or short-circuit calculatorLocation and voltage basis
Thermal withstandI2t calculatorFault current, time and conductor role
Device ratingManufacturer/project sourceBreaking capacity and clearing behaviour

Boundaries

  • Do not treat cable sizing as complete without protection context.
  • Do not treat public worksheets as selectivity studies.
  • Do not mix device data from another product family.
  • Do not hide manufacturer requirements behind calculator output.

Questions

Does this guide perform discrimination or selectivity studies?

No. It keeps worksheet records aligned. Manufacturer curves, coordination studies and engineering judgement remain separate work.

Can cable sizing be reviewed without protection context?

Only as a partial worksheet. Protection, fault duty, withstand and device data can still change the final decision.